Nahdlatul Ulama sebagai State-Embedded Islamic Civil Society: Relasi Agama, Negara, dan Kekuasaan di Indonesia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and the state by shifting attention from the normative question of whether a religious organization should be close to or distant from political power to the historical problem of how the modern state constitutes the categories, institutions, and boundaries of religion in public life. Drawing on a historical-conceptual approach and a critical review of scholarship on NU, Indonesian Islam, secularism, religious bureaucratization, and political patronage, the article develops the concept of state-embedded Islamic civil society. The concept refers to an Islamic civil-society organization that possesses internal sources of authority through pesantren, ulama, classical Islamic texts, bahtsul masail, and grassroots networks, while operating within legal, bureaucratic, electoral, and distributive fields constituted by the state. The article identifies six shifting modes of NU's embeddedness: colonial administration of Islam; religious mobilization and legitimation during the revolution; bureaucratization and party politics; New Order developmental discipline; civil-society reconstruction through the 1926 Khittah; and electoral-technocratic integration after Reformasi. It argues that NU-state relations are co-productive, ambivalent, unequal, and historically changing. The state constitutes NU through classification, recognition, regulation, and resource distribution, whereas NU shapes the state through religious legitimation, bureaucratic cadres, social networks, and normative knowledge. NU congresses are thus strategic arenas in which religious authority, bureaucracy, political parties, and markets compete to define the organization's direction. NU's autonomy does not require complete separation from the state, but rather the institutionalization of critical distance, transparency, conflict-of-interest controls, and organizational authority rooted in its constituency.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Akmaliah, Wahyudi. 2020. “The Demise of Moderate Islam: New Media, Contestation, and Reclaiming Religious Authorities” [Kemunduran Islam Moderat: Media Baru, Kontestasi, dan Perebutan Kembali Otoritas Keagamaan]. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 10 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v10i1.1-24.
Alvian, Rizky Alif, and Irfan Ardhani. 2023. “The Politics of Moderate Islam in Indonesia: Between International Pressure and Domestic Contestations” [Politik Islam Moderat di Indonesia: Antara Tekanan Internasional dan Kontestasi Domestik]. Al-Jami‘ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 61 (1): 19–57. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2023.611.19-57.
Arifianto, Alexander R. 2020. “Rising Islamism and the Struggle for Islamic Authority in Post-Reformasi Indonesia” [Menguatnya Islamisme dan Perebutan Otoritas Islam di Indonesia Pasca-Reformasi]. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 8 (1): 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2019.10.
Arifianto, Alexander R. 2021. “From Ideological to Political Sectarianism: Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, and the State in Indonesia” [Dari Sektarianisme Ideologis ke Sektarianisme Politik: Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, dan Negara di Indonesia]. Religion, State and Society 49 (2): 126–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2021.1902247.
Asad, Talal. 1986. The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam [Gagasan tentang Antropologi Islam]. Washington, DC: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.
Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam [Genealogi Agama: Disiplin dan Alasan Kekuasaan dalam Kekristenan dan Islam]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book.16014.
Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity [Formasi Sekuler: Kekristenan, Islam, Modernitas]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Aspinall, Edward, and Ward Berenschot. 2019. Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia [Demokrasi untuk Dijual: Pemilu, Klientelisme, dan Negara di Indonesia]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Aspinall, Edward, and Marcus Mietzner. 2019. “Southeast Asia’s Troubling Elections: Nondemocratic Pluralism in Indonesia” [Pemilu Bermasalah di Asia Tenggara: Pluralisme Nondemokratis di Indonesia]. Journal of Democracy 30 (4): 104–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0055.
Attar, Haekal. 2026. “PBNU Putuskan Muktamar Ke-35 NU Digelar di Pesantren Tambakberas Jombang, 27–31 Agustus 2026”. NU Online, July 7, 2026. https://nu.or.id/nasional/pbnu-putuskan-muktamar-ke-35-nu-digelar-di-pesantren-tambakberas-jombang-27-31-agustus-2026-RMQZj.
Benda, Harry J. 1958. The Crescent and the Rising Sun: Indonesian Islam under the Japanese Occupation, 1942–1945 [Bulan Sabit dan Matahari Terbit: Islam Indonesia di Bawah Pendudukan Jepang, 1942–1945]. The Hague: W. van Hoeve.
Boland, B. J. 1982. The Struggle of Islam in Modern Indonesia [Perjuangan Islam di Indonesia Modern]. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7895-2.
Bourchier, David. 2015. Illiberal Democracy in Indonesia: The Ideology of the Family State [Demokrasi Iliberal di Indonesia: Ideologi Negara Keluarga]. London: Routledge.
Bush, Robin. 2009. Nahdlatul Ulama and the Struggle for Power within Islam and Politics in Indonesia [Nahdlatul Ulama dan Perebutan Kekuasaan dalam Islam dan Politik di Indonesia]. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Fealy, Greg, and Katharine McGregor. 2010. “Nahdlatul Ulama and the Killings of 1965–66: Religion, Politics, and Remembrance” [Nahdlatul Ulama dan Pembunuhan 1965–66: Agama, Politik, dan Ingatan]. Indonesia 89 (April): 37–60.
Fealy, Greg. 2003. Ijtihad Politik Ulama: Sejarah NU 1952–1967. Translated by Farid Wajidi and Mulni Adelina Bachtar. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Feillard, Andrée. 1999. NU Vis-à-vis Negara: Pencarian Isi, Bentuk, dan Makna. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Fogg, Kevin W. 2019. Indonesia’s Islamic Revolution [Revolusi Islam Indonesia]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108768214.
Hasyim, Syafiq, and Hui Yew-Foong. 2022. “Nahdlatul Ulama’s Muktamar 2021 and Its Implications: Some Field Observations” [Muktamar Nahdlatul Ulama 2021 dan Implikasinya: Beberapa Catatan Lapangan]. ISEAS Perspective 2022/64. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. https://sealionplus.iseas.edu.sg/nodes/view/25398.
Hefner, Robert W. 2000. Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia [Islam Sipil: Muslim dan Demokratisasi di Indonesia]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. 2015. Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion [Melampaui Kebebasan Beragama: Politik Global Baru tentang Agama]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691166094.001.0001.
Jati, Wasisto Raharjo, Syamsurijal, Halimatusa’diah, Gutomo Bayu Aji, and Ihsan Yilmaz. 2024. “Reevaluating Approaches to Religious Moderation at the Grassroots Level: The Role of Muslim Youth in Advancing Interfaith Dialogue” [Mengevaluasi Ulang Pendekatan Moderasi Beragama di Tingkat Akar Rumput: Peran Pemuda Muslim dalam Memajukan Dialog Antaragama]. Al-Jami‘ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 62 (1): 185–213. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2024.621.185-213.
Laffan, Michael. 2003. Islamic Nationhood and Colonial Indonesia: The Umma Below the Winds [Kebangsaan Islam dan Indonesia Kolonial: Umat di Bawah Angin]. London: RoutledgeCurzon. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203222577.
Laffan, Michael. 2011. The Makings of Indonesian Islam: Orientalism and the Narration of a Sufi Past [Pembentukan Islam Indonesia: Orientalisme dan Narasi tentang Masa Lalu Sufi]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691145303.001.0001.
Mahmood, Saba. 2015. Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report [Perbedaan Agama di Zaman Sekuler: Sebuah Laporan Minoritas]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873531.
Menchik, Jeremy. 2016. Islam and Democracy in Indonesia: Tolerance without Liberalism [Islam dan Demokrasi di Indonesia: Toleransi tanpa Liberalisme]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316344446.
Mietzner, Marcus. 2018. “Fighting Illiberalism with Illiberalism: Islamist Populism and Democratic Deconsolidation in Indonesia” [Melawan Iliberalisme dengan Iliberalisme: Populisme Islamis dan Dekonsolidasi Demokrasi di Indonesia]. Pacific Affairs 91 (2): 261–82. https://doi.org/10.5509/2018912261.
Mietzner, Marcus. 2021. “Sources of Resistance to Democratic Decline: Indonesian Civil Society and Its Trials” [Sumber-Sumber Perlawanan terhadap Kemunduran Demokrasi: Masyarakat Sipil Indonesia dan Ujiannya]. Democratization 28 (1): 161–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1796649.
Mudzakkir, Amin. 2026. “Formation of the Post-Secular Public Sphere: Discourse and Practice of Religious Moderation in Indonesia” [Pembentukan Ruang Publik Pascasekuler: Wacana dan Praktik Moderasi Beragama di Indonesia]. In Islam, Conflict, and Political Transformation in Southeast Asia [Islam, Konflik, dan Transformasi Politik di Asia Tenggara], edited by Ahmad Suaedy, James B. Hoesterey, Amin Mudzakkir, and Ahmad Nuril Huda, 89–107. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-5473-7_5.
Rahman, Jasmine Hasna Nafila. 2025. “Who Speaks for Nahdlatul Ulama? Representation, Legitimacy, and the Politics of Claim-Making in the 2024 Presidential Election” [Siapa yang Berbicara atas Nama Nahdlatul Ulama? Representasi, Legitimasi, dan Politik Klaim dalam Pemilihan Presiden 2024]. PCD Journal 12 (2): 377–414. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.v12i2.16732.
Sezgin, Yüksel, and Mirjam Künkler. 2014. “Regulation of “Religion” and the “Religious”: The Politics of Judicialization and Bureaucratization in India and Indonesia” [Regulasi “Agama” dan yang “Religius”: Politik Yudisialisasi dan Birokratisasi di India dan Indonesia]. Comparative Studies in Society and History 56 (2): 448–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417514000103.
Suryana, A’an. 2025. Nahdlatul Ulama and Its Political Engagement with Indonesian Presidents [Nahdlatul Ulama dan Keterlibatan Politiknya dengan Presiden-Presiden Indonesia]. Trends in Southeast Asia 2025/19. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. https://bookshop.iseas.edu.sg/publication/7977.
van Bruinessen, Martin. 1994. NU: Tradisi, Relasi-Relasi Kuasa, Pencarian Wacana Baru. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Wadipalapa, Rendy Pahrun, and Aisah Putri Budiatri. 2025. “The Rise of Religious Brokerage: Nahdlatul Ulama in Indonesia’s 2024 Presidential Elections” [Bangkitnya Brokerase Keagamaan: Nahdlatul Ulama dalam Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia 2024]. Contemporary Southeast Asia 47 (1): 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs47-1c.